Summaries of hearings held with parties

Summaries of hearings held with parties

  • Ariste Holding (money Genie) 6.5.14
  • Barclays Bank plc (PDF, 37 Kb) 7.2.14
  • Money Converters British and also the customer Finance Association (PDF, 140 Kb) 2.5.14
  • CashEuroNetUK, LLC (PDF, 150 KB) 6.5.14
  • DFC worldwide Corp 30.5.14
  • Lloyds Banking Group (PDF, 43 Kb) 7.2.14
  • Mr Lender together with credit rating and Trade Association (PDF 143, Kb) 2.5.14
  • MYJAR (PDF, 119 KB) 6.6.14
  • Provident Financial plc (PDF, 45 Kb) 7.2.14
  • SRC Transatlantic Limited/ WageDayAdvance Limited 12.5.14
  • The Bucks Shop (139, PDF Kb) 02.5.14
  • The Financial Conduct Authority (PDF, 161 KB) 10.6.14
  • Think Finance (UK) Limited 30.5.14
  • Transcript associated with the multi-lateral hearing with customer bodies (PDF, 326 Kb) 07.2.14
  • Transcript for the multi-lateral hearing held using the trade associations and their users 30.5.14
  • Wizzcash (PDF 142, Kb) 2.5.14
  • Wonga 27.5.14

Responses to issues statement

  • BCCA (PDF, 113 Kb) 26.9.13
  • Cash Converters (UK) restricted (PDF, 64 Kb) 30.9.13
  • CashEuroNetUK, LLC 7.10.13
  • Citizens Advice (PDF, 50 Kb) 26.9.13
  • Citizens guidance Scotland (PDF, 395 Kb) 26.9.13
  • Consumer Finance Association (PDF, 73 Kb) 26.9.13
  • customer Finance Association response that is supplementary
  • Debt guidance Foundation (PDF, 295 Kb) 26.9.13
  • DFC worldwide Corp 4.10.13
  • Law Society of Scotland (PDF, 40 Kb) 30.9.13
  • cash information Trust (PDF, 66 Kb) 26.9.13
  • MYJAR (PDF, 97 Kb) 30.8.13
  • StepChange financial obligation Charity (PDF, 441 Kb) 3.10.13
  • Think Finance (UK) (PDF, 498 Kb) 26.9.13
  • Veritec Options LLC (PDF, 273 Kb) 3.10.13
  • Which? (PDF, 261 Kb) 26.9.13
  • Wonga Group Limited (PDF, 3.5 Mb) 4.10.13

Submissions

  • Albemarle & Bond (PDF, 33 Kb) 30.8.13
  • Amigo Loans Limited (PDF, 1.2Mb) 17.4.14
  • Credit rating Trade Association (PDF, 28 Kb) 22.8.13
  • CashEuroNetUK, LLC (PDF, 329 KB) 27.8.13
  • DFC Worldwide Corp 20.8.13
  • Equifax Ltd (PDF, 43 Kb) 20.8.13
  • LOAF (PDF, 117 Kb) 21.1.14
  • Mutual Clothing & provide Co Ltd (PDF, 326 Kb) 20.8.13
  • Think Finance (UK) Ltd (PDF, 34 Kb) 20.8.13
  • Wonga Group Limited (PDF, 1.1 Mb) 20.8.13

Invitation to discuss agencies invited to tender on research: Now closed

  • Invitation to comment on draft study questionnaire (PDF, 223 Kb) 26.9.13
  • Invitation to comment on visit of marketing research agency and study methodology (PDF, 43 Kb) 20.8.13
  • Invitation to comment on agencies invited to tender for marketing research (PDF, 41 Kb) 7.8.13

Issues statement

  • Annotated issues declaration (PDF, 176 Kb) 31.1.14
  • Problems declaration (PDF, 115 Kb) 14.8.13
  • news release: Payday financing research – problems declaration 14.8.13

Terms of guide

  • Terms of reference (PDF, 50 Kb) 27.6.13

Market research guide group

Case opened

Phase 1

Overview of work

On 6 March 2013, the OFT published a session document setting out its provisional choice to mention the payday financing market in the united kingdom towards the CC and exposed a general public assessment. The assessment document identified lots of features that the OFT suspected were – either independently or perhaps in combination – preventing, restricting or distorting competition in the forex market. The general public assessment closed on 1 might 2013.

On 27 June 2013, the OFT announced its decision that is final to the marketplace for payday financing in the UK towards the Competition Commission (CC) for an industry research. Having considered reactions towards the assessment, the OFT stayed for the view that there have been reasonable grounds for suspecting that has for the payday financing market had been preventing, limiting or competition that is distorting.

The features identified by the OFT had been:

Variability in conformity – the OFT Compliance Review discovered varying degrees of non-compliance with relevant legislation and guidance by payday lenders. The OFT suspects that people organizations which spend more hours and energy in complying could be put at a disadvantage that is competitive those that spend less.

Insufficient price transparency – the OFT has identified techniques which can make it problematic for customers to recognize or compare the cost that is full of loans efficiently during the point whenever loans are applied for. The OFT suspects why these techniques undermine cost competition by making customers in general less with the capacity of constraining costs.

Cost insensitive clients – an important percentage of payday borrowers have actually woeful credit records, restricted usage of other styles of credit and/or pushing needs. This might cause them to less cost delicate which, the OFT suspects, weakens cost competition between payday lenders.

Obstacles to switching – you can find obstacles to switching between payday loan providers or to alternate services and products or choices during the true point of rollover. The OFT suspects why these obstacles benefit incumbent loan providers and stop, limit or distort competition from feasible alternative lenders at the idea of rollover.

Market concentration – the OFT suspects that high concentration and obstacles to entry and expansion exacerbate the avoidance, restriction or distortion of competition as a result of the features identified above.

Action

The OFT, in workout of the abilities under Sections 131 associated with the Enterprise Act 2002 (the Act), referred the supply as well online bad credit hawaii as payday advances in britain towards the CC for research.

Leave a Reply